CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Fwd: Why?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Why?
From: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:15:10 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't the issue is as much about spectrum efficiency or channel characteristics as it is of the session-level protocol for RTTY and PSK31, for which there really isn't one. Both are "connection-less" protocols that don't require any kind of set-up and tear-down of a protocol structure before data is exchanged. Characters are typed, out they go, and anyone can receive them or respond to them without negotiation. That's what you need for a contest environment. If you are talking about data transfer - that's a completely different problem.

73, Ward N0AX

On 1/9/2015 11:00 AM, cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
How can we entice a sufficient number of contest ops "pack the bands" in
a contest using BPSK (31 or 63) to determine if the bandwidth advantages
for PSK outweigh the disadvantages concerning multi-path distortion, etc.?

72/73 de n8xx Hg

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>