CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Do I need to operate assisted to figure out the calls?

To: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Do I need to operate assisted to figure out the calls?
From: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:26:34 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jim,

In my humble opinion, playing Judge, jury and executioner is not the way to
go. The operators/stations that get a lot of NIL's will check there UBN
reports and might want to return te favor in the future.
Returning bad operating practice with bad operating practice is never a
good thing.
I do, however, understand where you are comming from.

Leave the judging to the sponsors and let them penalize the offenders. In
order to do that, the sponsors should, as sugested before, draw up a rule
that stations need to ID after every 2 or 3 QSO's.

73, Maarten PD2R


Op dinsdag 31 juli 2012 schreef Jim Rhodes (jimk0xu@gmail.com) het volgende:

> Like I have said before. I will call and if I get an answer, but no ID I
> just don't log them. I do not ask for ID I don't tell them they are not in
> my log. I just move on. Maybe I will try to work them later in contest (I
> don't know who they are do I). If I get a "WK B4" out of them, it is their
> loss not mine. If we all did this the practice would come to a very quick
> end. No matter how stupid they are a few hundred (thousand?) NILs should
> get their attention eventually.
>
>
>

-- 
73, Maarten PD2R
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>