To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] 40 M "new" Approach |
From: | "w0uo" <w0uo@citbroadband.com> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:55:24 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Steve, Think Central Electronics 10B or 20A, the SSB signal was generated on one sideband only, and the mixing scheme resulted in LSB below 9 MHz and USB above 9 MHz. At one time this was the technical reason for the convention and, obviously, it no longer applies. Jim W0UO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, K0HB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Michael Tope |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, kr2q |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections, Kenneth E. Harker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |