CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment

To: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:28:22 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Tod -ID <tod@k0to.us> wrote:
>
>
> I am puzzled by why my suggestion about leaving the categories as is and
> simply identifying everyone who used some form of Skimmer seems so
> underwhelming to folks.


        Perhaps it's underwhelming because it doesn't address the primary
issue...is Skimmer Unassisted or Assisted?  If I entered Unassisted (sans
Skimmer) but someone else who entered Unassisted (with Skimmer) had a higher
score, who will the sponsor say won the Unassisted category?  Is that simple
enough?

                                                       73,  Bill  W4ZV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>