CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules
From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:31:03 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Kelly, VE4XT, wrote:

> I also see absolutely no reason why a ham running a KP4 station must be
> physically located in KP4 -- so long as he's not running the KP4 station but
> passing himself off as a VE4, for instance.

I checked with the ARRL Contest Manger last year about operating remotely in 
the ARRL DX Contest from KP2 via remote while still here in California.  "No 
problem".

Well, "THEE Problem" is that nasty thing called "Latency" (especially for 35WPM 
CW).  I finally got Wireless Internet here, but trying several routes, it's 
still between 150ms to over 200ms latency ;-(

For one local remote site location here, I can be at less than 5ms latency with 
point-to-point 5GHZ gear from AIRAYA ( http://www.airaya.com ).  It will take 
mucho $$$ for a solar power setup, however less than $100,000 to run landline 
electrical up to "Locust Peak" ;-(

FYI & 73...

Rick, K6VVA


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>