CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Annual Suggestion

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Annual Suggestion
From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:41:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
John K1AR, wrote:

> If we introduced a 36-hour group, a subset of those operators who  continue
> to "lose" in their newly created category would want to parse  it further. It$
> an endless downward spiral.

Based upon comments in support of such a venue, maybe THEE solution is not a 
separate category, but as N3BB suggested, to go the route of WPX, etc. and max 
the SO time at 36 hours.

Let's see:  WPX, SS, CQP & others have SO time limits out of the total event 
hours, so an established precedent exists for such a venue.

However, God Forbid anyone screw with the existing 48 hours for the M/S, M/2 or 
M/M categories, and I in no way advocate any changes thereto.  

73...

Rick, K6VVA

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>