CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestio

To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>,"Radiosporting Fan" <radiosporting@yahoo.com>,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was: Logcheckingquestions]
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:46:55 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

--
  http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb



>
> I've said this before but I'll say it again: I would like to see two 
> basic categories in contesting.
>
> 1. A strictly limited hardware setup, much like the WRTC contest for 
> those who prefer to focus on the traditional style of contesting. One 
> radio, no packet or telnet, one antenna per band, etc.
>
> 2. An unlimited hardware category where anything is allowed.
>
> Within those there could be subdivisions for HP/LP/QRP and multi op.
>
> It is not possible to satisfy everyone but I think this would go a long
way.
>
> Comments?
>

Wouldn't satisfy me.  If we can only have two categories, I'd like to see:

1) I did it all myself. (LP/HP/QRP)

2) I had some help from some other guys. (LP/HP/QRP/Packet/Multi Op)

73, de Hans, K0HB




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>