I received 17, yes 17, private emails asking me to name names. Well for obvious
reasons I am not going to do that but I wanted to respond publicly to at least
this one, because I found it interestingly offensive. As you can see it comes
from someone who has gained a certain amount of stature in the contesting
community.
John said:"""".
Over the last few years I've complained often and loudly about being spotted
during domestic contests, especially SS. I've watched my run-rate go from
something very comfortable to having a big pile-up. Without exception my
run-rate jumped up because I was spotted on packet. AND without exception
checking the results, against my log during those rapid rate increases, shows
none, not one, of the stations worked during those periods reported themselves
as a muli-op. They ALL were in the single op category. If it happened once, or
maybe even twice, it might be coincidence but over several contests it is no
longer coincidence but cheating.
If you need further 'proof' look at CQP. There were hundreds and hundreds of
spots on the cluster. Other than the big multi efforts in CA there will be less
than a dozen claim they were multi. It's the same during other domestic
contests like SS and NAQP except on a larger scale. The ratio of spots/spotters
to logs submitted as multi would be laughable if it weren't for the fact that
it clearly shows there is a problem of integrity during contests.
John might I suggest rather than taking cheap pot-shots at the messenger why
not help find a solution to this problem. Is there not a way to make the multi
category more attractive? There must be some incentive, bigger or more
trophies, larger or more bold fonts in results, something to move the folks who
are using packet, during contests, into the multi category.
Hopefully a solution can be found that will satisfy everyone.
Best 73's
MAL N7MAL
BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
http://geocities.com/n7mal/
Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia
----- Original Message -----
From: K1AR@aol.com
To: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:59
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight
In a message dated 10/9/2005 7:19:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
N7MAL@CITLINK.NET writes:
It is easy to see that Packet-Cluster cheating is rampant and is a real
threat to honest contesting.
Mal--
With all due respect, you're out of your league with this comment. Can you
identify a single entrant that fits your cheating assertion above? I doubt it,
but I'd like to see your list.
Be careful with these claims that are not fact based. The reality is that, at
least for the CQ WW and ARRL DX contests, packet cheaters are aggressively
sought out, discovered and dealt with appropriately.
Please reply.
73 John, K1AR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|