CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns

To: "Derrick Belbas" <ve4vv@shaw.ca>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns
From: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Reply-to: Mark Steven Williams <K9GX@N4GN.COM>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:06:25 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
You didn't specify CW or SSB?

On fone, how about something like KB9XYZ/AG portable KG4.

On CW, KF6JXP/AE/WP4...or KF6PFQ/QRP/VY1....

That's about as obnoxious as I can conjure.

Next.....

K9GX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derrick Belbas" <ve4vv@shaw.ca>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 6:45 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns


> VE7VEDAY was recently active, and still might be, for all I know.
>
> When Kelly and I did the Minnesota QSO party, we briefly considered using
> W0/J79VV/m/(3 letter county name), but we elected to not do that after I 
> was
> advised by ARRL that I should properly use a VE#xxx/W0 call, which was
> arduous enough.
>
> There was a recent change to the call sign rules up here allowing lengthy
> suffixes, so expect to hear more of those.  But they won't allow 2x1's for
> daily use.  Go figure.  Apparently it's a "prestige" issue.
>
> 73
>
> derrick
> VE4VV
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>