CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX

To: "Cq-Contest@Contesting.Com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX
From: "Dave" <VO1AU@rac.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:45:29 -0230
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I recall one clever fellow remarking "if you're on 160m in the WPX contest,
you're losing."  It's missionary work, but good luck to you if you do it.

73,

Dave
VO1AU@rac.ca


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:56 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 160M in CW WPX


> It's been a few years since I last did the CW WPX, and I didn't have a
160M
> antenna then.  The question, basically, is whether it's worth spending
time
> on 160 and, if so, what sort of schedule people tend to observe?  Do you
go
> from 40 or 80 to 160 during the night at intervals, or???
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> The World HF Contest Station Database
> was updated on April 26, 2004
> 2706 contest stations at
> www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>