To: | "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article |
From: | Bill Coleman <aa4lr@mac.com> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:27:16 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Jan 16, 2004, at 8:43 PM, Mark Beckwith wrote: KI9A steered us toward the February Op-Ed in QST proposing phone contest Fair and balanced? He's basically saying that contest operation isn't as valuable as other types of amateur activities, so let's restrict it. He want's to block off 100 kHz of 80m so guys can get on and talk about their various geriatric aliments without having to suffer any contest QRM. (OK, so maybe I'm passing judgement here, too. Harumph) So are all you phone guys out there giving us a bad name or what? There just isn't room! SSB signals might be as close as 2 kHz apart without completely blowing each other out of the water. CW signals can get to 250 Hz and closer. On 20m, with 200 kHz for SSB operation, there's only room for about 100 "channels". 100 channels on CW would only be 25 kHz. Plus the fact that Phone contests generate a lot more activity. And that's likely to increase as more countries adopt codeless HF license classes. So help me out here (since I am not a real serious phone contester) have Something like NAQP? No. SS, ARRL DX, CQWW, WPX - Yes. Or is the guy who is claiming that in QST just not shooting straight? He says he's a contestor, too, but if he doesn't bother to send in a low, even for a small effort, it doesn't count in my book. Why NOT limit contests on 20M to below 14.297? Sure, so long as we reserve 14.150-14.200 for contest-only operation.
--------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article, Bill Coleman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article, Bill Coleman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article, Tom Horton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article, Kelly Taylor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |