| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) | 
|---|---|
| From: | abrogdon@arrl.org (Brogdon, Al, W1AB) | 
| Date: | Fri Mar 7 09:21:00 1997 | 
| 
>From: martin38945
>To: cq-contest
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?)
>
>"How come CT doesn't recognize T1?"
_______________
Herr Martin,
     We in CT have recognized T1 since the Treaty of 1810.5.  "Und why?" you 
might ask.  Simple--to get the added multiplier, even if the note IS very 
bad.
                         Al, 599 CT
--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CT Master.DTA, Dan Weisenburger | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Update's QSL Routes CQWW 1996, Pascual.Guardiola@inte.haci.carm.es | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?), Randy Thompson | 
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Novice/Tech in DX contests, Dan Robbins | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |