Hello group. I am trying to model a M2 2M9 for a friend for his rover use.
I have an EZNEC model (not sure where I got it from) for the M2 2M12. By
looking at the PDF manual for the 2M12 and comparing it to the EZNEC model I
have on hand, I can see that an element length correction factor has been
applied to each element. I.e., each element is slightly shorter in the
model than in real life because the element passes through the boom.
I am puzzled a bit as I noticed that the correction factor varies slightly
from one element to another. One element is approx 99.65% of the PDF manual
length, another element showed up as 99.21%, while a 3rd element showed up
as 99.38 %. They are actually all a little different from each other.
I guess I have two questions; is my model of the 2M12 wrong because it shows
variable correction factors? And, if the correction factor is required to
be constant, what should that factor be so I can generate valid models for
these antennas?
Ok, maybe one more question, what should the correction factor be for CC
antennas like the 17B2 where the elements are mounted with a clamp on top of
the boom? Thank you.
73, Gedas, W8BYA
Gallery at http://w8bya.com
Light travels faster than sound....
This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
_______________________________________________
Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware
|