Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Homebrew is back..

To: "Diane & Edward Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>, "Roger \(sub1\)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Homebrew is back..
From: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:26:25 +0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
There are so many 813 resource  in China ( NOS and  factory new ) that I'm 
designing  2x813 GG amplifier
     73!Hsu.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Diane & Edward Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
To: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Homebrew is back..


> Hi Roger,
> 
> Nice note---thanks!
> 
> Yes, the 813 has cost advantages, alright---but you have to jump through
> some hoops in order to make them "play" on 15- and 10-meters efficiently,
> because of the high interelectrode output capacitance of them (ex. on
> 10-meters, a paralleled pair display a total of, I believe, 28-pfd., which
> is actually more than the plate tuning capacitor value needed on that
> band!).
> 
> Makes you wonder how that fellow you mentioned got away with FOUR in
> parallel! (maybe his was strictly a low-band design...?).
> 
> What I did here with mine is employ a 25-uh. 1/4" edge-wound copper ribbon
> variable inductor as a pi tank coil...and I incorporated a rugged ceramic
> Centralab "bandswitch" that allows me to REMOVE the plate tuning cap out of
> the circuit entirely. I then RESONATE the final tank on 15- and 10-meters by
> varying the "L", and using the high interelectorode "C" as a "built-in"
> capacitor.
> 
> For 10-meters, though, there's another step that needs to be taken: I switch
> in a 0.3-uh. silver-plated 1/8" copper coil in series with the paralleled
> plates, to act as an RF transformer of sorts. It's all detailed in my 1985
> ARRL HANDBOOK, which references the issue of QST that the idea came out
> of...
> 
> It's a bit of an exercise, to be sure, but the work-out entails one's GRAY
> matter, and NOT one's pocketbook! Hi Hi. I think it's worth it.
> 
> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
> 
> 
> *******************************************
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
> To: "Diane & Edward Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
> Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Homebrew is back..
> 
> 
>> On 3/28/2011 3:38 PM, Diane & Edward Swynar wrote:
>> > Hi Roger et al,
>> >
>> > I use a pair of 813s in parallel grounded-grid service here in my
> homebrewed
>> > KW amplifier, and---I'm blushing as I type this!---but I have NEVER EVER
>> > purchased any of the jugs that are in it, or the spares that I have
> here,
>> > brand new...
>> >
>>
>> I forgot the old 813.  I have 3 of them up on the shelf and keep looking
>> for more.
>> I used to run the "old legal limit" with a pair of them as you
>> describe.  I ran into a guy on 40 a while back who claimed he could get
>> 2400 PEP out of 4 of them. I don't know if his amp was a monoband or
>> covered all of the HF bands.
>>
>> I see the GS-31 (1KW), GI-46 (1KW), and little GI-7B are at reasonable
>> prices and seem popular.  With the removable anode coolers on this
>> series and the popularity of converting the old Dentron MLA2500B to a
>> pair of GI-7Bs that no one has machined a transverse version of the
>> cooler to make them even more compatible with the old 8875s I think they
>> used.
>>
>> > They are all either Hamfest finds, or freebies from friends.
>> >
>> > Life's far too short to pay-off a retiree's ransom for new&  exotic
>> > tubes---
>>
>> AMEN!
>>
>> > and I have yet to hear anyone at the DX end of my QSOs asking me (or
>> > expressing any care whatsoever) which tube(s) I might be using! Hi Hi
>>
>> There does seem to be a lot of interest in what tube(s) are in homebrew
>> amps though.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Roger (K8RI)
>>
>>
>> > ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
>> >
>> >
>> > **********************************************
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Roger (sub1)"<sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
>> > To:<amps@contesting.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 1:11 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Amps] Homebrew is back..
>> >
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>