To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] furnace |
From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:34:00 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Bill, I monitored a great deal of the Katrina disaster commo on the low bands. the net controls were the hams on the scenes of disaster running exciters barefoot from batteries and generators if they could get gas. because all or 98% of ham towers had blown down they were operating with low hanging wire antennas and lousy verticals. they were copyable on phone but partly because of the time of year and the resulting qrn, exciter power and makeshift antennas, had signals that were less than commanding. A 100 w. rig on a car battery is not a 100 w. rig either; they would cut peak power back to maybe 50 w. because they didn't always know how long it would be before they could swap power sources and wanted to conserve the juice. A disaster net control where possible needs a dominant signal, in order to hold a frequency, get through lids and intentional trouble makers, make others aware on nearby frequencies that something important is taking place so hopefully they will kindly relocate a gentlemanly distance, and get traffic through with no need for fills. 10 kw is way overkill, but if a net control has a 500 w. to 1.5 kw and the supply to run it, it is appreciated by all. 73, rob / k5uj <<<We were talking Katrina-level communication, not overseas MARS. Nobody on the other side of the world is going to be of much help with Katrina-type disasters. :-) Like it says in the FCC rules, use the power appropriate to the communication. 73, Bill W6WRT>>> _________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] How about this furnace?, R . Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] How about this furnace?, crawfish |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Motorola Nucleus Amplifier Help needed, Michael J. Clarson |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] 3-500 Old vs New Style, w6ah |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |