Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Mine is bigger than yours (was: Re: Standbytubes (was:Evenmor

To: <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Mine is bigger than yours (was: Re: Standbytubes (was:Evenmore power solid-state amp's))
From: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>
Reply-to: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:29:41 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
You are just pulling my leg right?  You see that even though the "Final 
Amplifier" could run legal power as specified in the regs... the driver 
stage could run (fill in the blank here)... and basically just couple power 
past the "Final Amplifier" by some simple.... lets call it a neutralization 
coupling circuit...?

Sincerely,

Dr. William J. Schmidt, II  K9HZ
Trustee of the North American QRO - Central Division Club - K9ZC

Email: bill@wjschmidt.com
WebPage: www.wjschmidt.com

"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; that 
will do them in."  -- Bradley's Bromide


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
To: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Mine is bigger than yours (was: Re: Standby tubes 
(was:Evenmore power solid-state amp's))


> ??  Don't see where a 50 kw driver would even come close. The old rules 
> said you could run 1 kw input to the final. For ssb that was the plate 
> voltage times the plate current as read on meter peaks. The time constant 
> of the meter could be no more than .25 sec.
> PEP was not specified. PEP probably runs around 5 to 6 times what is read 
> on the meters when no compression is used.
>
> 73
> Gary  K4FMX
>
> Dr. William J. Schmidt, II wrote:
>> This brings to mind a good story... When first licensed back in the late 
>> sixties as school kids, the FCC regs read such that the power input to 
>> the final stage of an amateur transmitter shall be no more than 1 kW on 
>> CW and 2 kW P.E.P.   My ham buddies and I always fantasized about that 50 
>> kW driver stage that would have, technically, met the regs....  someone 
>> finally got smart and changed the regs!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Dr. William J. Schmidt, II  K9HZ
>> Trustee of the North American QRO - Central Division Club - K9ZC
>>
>> Email: bill@wjschmidt.com
>> WebPage: www.wjschmidt.com
>>
>> "If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee; 
>> that will do them in."  -- Bradley's Bromide
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "R.Measures" <r@somis.org>
>> To: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>
>> Cc: "'Pete Smith'" <n4zr@contesting.com>; <amps@contesting.com>; 
>> <craxd1@ezwv.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 5:13 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Mine is bigger than yours (was: Re: Standby tubes 
>> (was:Evenmore power solid-state amp's))
>>
>>
>>
>>>A 4cx35.000C in AB1 is what a wealthy Ham in Japan reportedly ran.
>>>(22kV anode -- 32A-pk cathode emission, breathed more air than
>>>Godzilla).  He reportedly said that the beast was not good for calling
>>>CQ because many people would come back to him that he could not hear.
>>>This problem is commonly called Nile crocodile syndrome.
>>>
>>>On Apr 2, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Phil Clements wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>All this WLW stuff is fun, but I believe that VOA still has a few of
>>>>their
>>>>1 megawatt medium-wave transmitters left, and there was a reference in
>>>>www.worldofradio.com to a 2-megawatt medium-wave station in Saudi
>>>>Arabia.
>>>>
>>>>73, Pete N4ZR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There is no doubt in my mind that several of us, (me included) would
>>>>dearly
>>>>love to mash the PTT button just one time on that one-mega-watter, and
>>>>holler "CQ DX" just one time!!
>>>>
>>>>(((73)))
>>>>Phil, K5PC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Amps mailing list
>>>>Amps@contesting.com
>>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Amps mailing list
>>>Amps@contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>