John and Vic, 
 
That's what I thought by reading it but never seen anything of a beast  
like a L-Pi so I thought it would be wrong to comment. The only other  
thing I could think he meant was adding to the tank coil. I guess that  
might be done, but I've never seen it used. The best he could really do is  
use a dip meter and find where it tuned using one coil. 
 
Will 
 
 
 
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:24 -0600, W0UN -- John Brosnahan  
<shr@swtexas.net> wrote: 
 
At 12:22 PM 1/21/2005, Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote:
 Will, 
 
 I believe Chris is talking about converting from a PI network to  a  
Pi-L 
network. The Pi-L having two levels of impedance matching, and a  
little  more 
harmonic suppression, than the original Pi network. 
 Thus the original Tune C becomes the middle capacitor of the Pi-L,   
allowing 
for a larger value of C, and the plate C is now the new Tune C. 
 Also, If his tune cap is already backed all the way out, he needs  LESS 
inductance in the tank to tune it, not more... Therefore he would be   
SPREADING 
the coil turns apart, or removing a turn, or moving the tap towards   
less turns, 
any of which would result in less inductance in the tank  circuit.... 
 
Regards, 
 
Dennis O. 
 
 
 
 In a message dated 1/21/05 11:49:21 AM Central Standard Time,
craxd1@ezwv.com writes:
  
A 300 nH  coil (0.3 uH) is not very much. Assuming this would be the  
tank 
coil, the 10 meter end being the largest in size, one might just   
squeeze 
the coils together to raise the inductance enough to bring  it in tune.  
If 
not, adding 1 to 2 turns of the same size wire, and  same diameter would 
most likely do it. A dip meter would be easier  to use to find the exact 
placing of the tap on the coil if it has  taps. According to the way the 
tube is ran and tube type, some at a  higher frequencies dont need a  
tune C 
in order to tune correctly  because the tubes output C is high enough  
and 
takes care of it. In  the amps I've seen this way, a load C was all that 
was  used.
  
 
Actually it is the other way around.  The pi-L normally refers to moving  
the 
output cap (loading) to a higher impedance point and matching this 
intermediate impedance to 50 ohms with the L network.  This provides 
additional harmonic suppression as well as reducing the amount of 
capacitance required for this "shared" capacitor, shared between the 
output of the pi section and the input of the L section.  Downside is 
that the load capacitor requires a higher voltage rating because the 
impedance is no longer 50 ohms but a few times higher. 
 
What Chris is trying to do is the exact opposite.  He is trying to move  
the 
Tune capacitor to a lower impedance point by adding a new L between 
the original network and the anode of the tube.  I guess this could be  
called 
an L-pi network.  Since the impedance is now lower at this new point 
you need more C for the tune cap -- and that may allow a capacitor with 
a higher minimum C to be used. 
 
So this new inductor is to be placed between the TUBE and the TUNE
capacitor.  
I have used the 3CPX5000A7s in pulse mode at 50 MHz for wind profiling 
and that is what I did.  The average observer would just think my plate  
lead 
was pretty darn long.  But in reality it is an inductor that is part of  
an L 
network that steps down the impedance so that the Tune cap can resonate 
the circuit without running into a minimum capacitance issue.  The tune  
cap 
is now "shared" between this L network on the tube side and the pi  
network 
for matching the new impedance to the output impedance.  In my case I 
also used another inductor at the output, once again a long lead and not 
a "real" coil, so my matching is technically called an L-pi-L network, I  
guess. 
 
Some of this effect exists in any case just due to stray inductance in  
the 
leads, but this is increasing the inductance to a value high enough to  
make L 
networks that provide useful impedance stepping. 
 
--John  W0UN 
 
 _______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
  
 __________ NOD32 1.880 (20040928) Information __________ 
 
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32.com  
 
  
 
 --
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
  
 |