| To: | <amps@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Amps] RG-174 power handling capacity | 
| From: | g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson) | 
| Date: | Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:14:44 +0000 | 
On Thursday 04 April 2002 11:32, Pete Smith wrote: > I need some small-diameter coax for rewiring the input side RF connections > in my SB-220. Is RG-174 adequate for the power levels encountered (125w > max, <50% duty cycle) or would I be better off to go with a teflon variant. Suhner rates 174 good for 250W cw at 30MHz, 20 deg. C. That presumably gets it up to rated max. temp. of 70 deg. C so you can work out the temp. rise for your conditions. Steve  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] RG-174, Pete Smith | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] RG-174 power handling capacity, Steve Thompson | 
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] RG-174 power handling capacity, krish | 
| Next by Thread: | [Amps] RG-174 power handling capacity, Bob Alexander | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |