Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc
From: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:20:15 -0800
>Richard Measures (AG6K) wrote:
>
>>I had  reports that my TS-440S was not as clean as my old TS-830S, so I
>>decided to try and do something about it.  Since most IMD occurs when the
>>transistor is at maximum peak collector current - when Vc is close to its
>>minimum, I figured that giving the transistors more "head-room" might
>>help.  The 440 is speced at 12v to 16v, so I increased Vcc to 16v and got
>>on the air.  Several friends reported that the IMD was reduced with 16
>>volts.  [note - the electrolytic caps in the 440 are rated at 16wv and
>>the output transistors are rated at 18VDC of Vcc]
>
>For what little it may be worth, I am well aware of many anecdotal 
>experiences with the TS-430/TS-440/TS-140 series transceivers in which 
>they'll get VERY nasty sounding if run at a MINIMUM supply voltage of 
>anything less than about 12.6VDC.
>
>Many (good) ops tend to assume that their power supplies (even Astrons) are 
>always set up so they put out 13-14VDC. Unfortunately this is not a safe 
>assumption. They're usually the ones who have gotten burned with poor 
>reports.

?  As long as rotten splatter doesn't go outside the band, it is not 
against the Part 97 rules.  
>
>I'm not sure I'd run my rigs at 16VDC, but I'd sure suggest 14VDC (under 
>load!) as a minimum supply voltage
>
?  My 440 has so far operated ok on 16v for a couple of days.  Time will 
tell if it will last.  
>
cheers, Tom

-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>