**********Why? Please explain.
Thanks Will, K6NDV
-
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:22 AM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [AMPS] ACOM Amps
QRO Amps are better. Period.
At 07:08 AM 7/2/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
>They are alive and very well. They had a very nice booth at Dayton this
>year.
>
>One of my friends, Tom, AE9B, went and spent some time looking at the amps
>and talking to the guys. He was very impressed and felt that they Acom
>design was better than anyone else's on the market. He thought the
>construction, features, performance and price were all very much in line.
>
>They are still very much around.
>
>Of course, never tell anyone on amps that you bought anything. You'll get
>inquisitioned about why you didn't build it yourself! :-)
>
>73,
>
>Jon
>NA9D
>
>on 6/30/01 3:39 PM, TNeill1648@aol.com at TNeill1648@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I am in the market for another amp and have been considering the 87A and
ACOM
>> 2000A. It appears as though ACOM has not been advertising recently. Is
>> something going on with them? Any user reports on the 2000A amplifier
would
>> be appreciated. Thank you.
>>
>> Tom K4XG
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------
>Jon Ogden
>NA9D (ex: KE9NA)
>
>Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA
>
>http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
>
>"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
>
-Chuck K8CPA
http://www.qsl.net/k8cpa -- My WebPage
http://communities.msn.com/MultiModeMailinglist/messageboard.msnw<----
Multi-mode mailing list...
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|