>Peter G3RZP wrote:
>My experience with 572s suggests that operation at 50 MHz is going to be
>interesting from a stability point of view. The grid leads are just far
too
>long for operation up there. Series tuning might help, but what the
>efficiency will be is another matter. I'd use something else.
>John ZS5JF wrote:
>grid to plate = 6.0pF
>grid to filament = 5.9pF
>Plate to filament = 0.8pF
>I guess if the grid isn't totally, solidly, held to chassis and
everything else >using low inductance grounding then this tube will make
a superb oscillator!!
Thanks for data John, I can stop hunting for my own copies...
Thus, I agree. I remembered it's upper was 30mhz but that doesn't
usually mean they can't be pushed always |-). I think Phil
should start thinking FET or 3-500z or 4cx400a or 4cx800a.
73, Jerry krr2ak@juno.com
[text|uuencode|59kb ea]
'Our people are warriors, often savage, but we are also many
other pleasant things'
73, Jerry krr2ak@juno.com
[text|uuencode|59kb ea]
'Our people are warriors, often savage, but we are also many
other pleasant things'
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|