Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+verticals\s+and\s+radials\s+and\s+such\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+verticals\s+and\s+radials\s+and\s+such\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: verticals and radials and such (score: 1): Author: Trent Fleming <trent.fleming@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:33:34 -0600; All, I have been reading through the threads on bare vs insulated radial wire, and also on the chicken wire "screen" issue. I am so impressed with this group in terms of the professional and civil wa; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00102.html (7,979 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: verticals and radials and such (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:12:30 -0600; -- My opinion is that the writing style (and perhaps editing) created the wrong impression of Al's work -- all he showed was that losses occur in the ground system area. If there is any revelation,; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00121.html (8,219 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: verticals and radials and such (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:13:24 -0700; NCJ radial article: The NCJ article included far-field losses and that is what made the verticals seem rather inefficient with even a fine ground system. Previous articles and research have focused o; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00125.html (7,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]