Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+topband\:\s+Tee\s+Verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+topband\:\s+Tee\s+Verticals\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:34:12 -0400; For several years now I have used a 65' tall "Tee" vertical on 160. It is an open wire fed 80 meter dipole with the feed point shorted and fed together. This is fed against 6 or 7 elevated 1/4 wave r; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00137.html (8,360 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:47:31 -0700; Not necessarily. It will depend on how high the dipole is and how it interacts with your terrain. My 80M vertical (quarter wave) is significantly better than my 35 ft high dipole almost anywhere in N; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00148.html (7,703 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]