Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+shunt\-fed\s+bandwidth\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+shunt\-fed\s+bandwidth\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: shunt-fed bandwidth (score: 1): Author: k9nr@juno.com (Donald L Kerouac); Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:40:31 -0500; Something to keep in back of your mind if you're shunt or series feeding your tower for 160. If your antenna has a wonderfully wide bandwidth, it may be due to a mediocre ground system. Ground losses; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00024.html (7,239 bytes)
2. Topband: shunt-fed bandwidth (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:23 -0400; Hi Don, I hope you don't mind my pointing out something. While your suggestions are all good ones, I can site cases where the rules are broken..... Consider a case of a single (or small number of) el; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00025.html (8,628 bytes)
3. Topband: shunt-fed bandwidth (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 19:39:45 +0200; In my tests I found an RF ammeter (thermocouple) to measure the whole radials current matches fine with the fields results. More or less, when current does not continue to increase noticeably, also f; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00027.html (7,177 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]