Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+remote\s+rx\s+ant\/rx\s+link\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+remote\s+rx\s+ant\/rx\s+link\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: remote rx ant/rx link (score: 1): Author: Michael Sapp <Michael_Sapp_WA3TTS@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:14:05 -0500; move If the path is line-of-site, you could probably heterodyne part or all of the MF-HF band RF on a near-infrared laser TX and down convert it with an IR optical RX converter at the other end. I h; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00065.html (8,022 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: remote rx ant/rx link (score: 1): Author: "john battin" <jbattin@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:22:20 -0600; If you put the RX front-end at the remote and the back-end at the house, the big issue will be dynamic range, especially with a crowded band like 160. Since the filtering will be at the back-end, th; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00068.html (8,340 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: remote rx ant/rx link (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:36:33 +1300; I agree with John and that's what I do with my remote. Mine is a bit further away (20 mi) and I use a duplex FM UHF link - control on the uplink, audio and telemetry on the downlink. I was also conc; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00070.html (7,407 bytes)
4. Topband: remote rx ant/rx link (score: 1): Author: "Kostas sv1dpi" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:34:19 +0200; I agree with John and that's what I do with my remote. Mine is a bit further away (20 mi) and I use a duplex FM UHF link - control on the uplink, audio and telemetry on the downlink. I was also conce; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00073.html (8,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]