- 1. Topband: re: 160m band plan and CQWW SSB contest (score: 1)
- Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke)
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
- N4TZ wrote on contesting.com: -- Given the FCC "enforcement" of the "gentlemens agreement" on 160m, whereby we are supposed to stay above 1843 on SSB, where should I look for my 160m multipliers in t
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00110.html (7,873 bytes)
- 2. Topband: re: 160m band plan and CQWW SSB contest (score: 1)
- Author: earlham@radiks.net (earlham@radiks.net)
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:14:32 -0400
- Nice to see someone taking a leadership role with regard to the bandplan, particularly in a major contest. Hopefully, some of the other major contest stations outside of the U.S. (and within) will de
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00114.html (8,853 bytes)
- 3. SV: Topband: re: 160m band plan and CQWW SSB contest (score: 1)
- Author: oforr@online.no (Ole Forr)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:58:44 +0200
- In Norway we are now allowed to opperate 1000 watts in the 4 "big" international contests: CQWW 160 m contest, ARRL International DX SSB Contest, CQWW WPX SSB Contest and CQWW DX SSB Contest 1840 - 1
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00130.html (8,945 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu