Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+pre\-selector\/filter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+pre\-selector\/filter\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: pre-selector/filter (score: 1): Author: "Raoul Coetzee" <raoulc@smmcape.co.za>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:31:55 +0200; To all the boffins out there: Is it possible that a good pre-selector (band pass filter) in front of your favourite receiver may improve your rx in general on top band, even though you have no reason; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00116.html (7,298 bytes)
2. Topband: pre-selector/filter (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:32:52 -0800 (PST); I am assuming that this preselector is passive... If it is an active device, forget it - all it is going to do is overload and create intermod... Now, if it is passive, then it is likely to help... T; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00119.html (7,227 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: pre-selector/filter (score: 1): Author: "Brad Rehm" <bradrehm@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:31:37 -0600; Denny, I agree with your comment on the VRF in the Mk V. It's interesting that the very expensive micro-tune filters in the newer Yaesu radios don't seem to me to work as well. Which of the older re; /archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00121.html (7,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]