- 1. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 1)
- Author: df2py@t-online.de (DF2PY)
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:53:06 +0100
- hi gang ! With big surprise i`ve been reading about the big success some people have on 160 with small size antenas.I guess that much of that success is due to the geographical location ( 5B4ADA ) an
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00095.html (7,941 bytes)
- 2. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 1)
- Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz)
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:23:21 +0100
- Hello Wolf, First of all I agree with you we in our part of Europe should have antennas as good as possible. Anyway this is not always possible and I suppose its better to use what you are able to h
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00098.html (8,164 bytes)
- 3. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 1)
- Author: herbs@islands.vi (Herb Schoenbohm)
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:27:37 -0400
- Wolf, I would like to add a non technical spin to your wisdom on this subject, especially after reflecting on our last 1.8 Mhz contact wherein you where as loud as any European I have ever heard and
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00100.html (10,403 bytes)
- 4. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 1)
- Author: 9a3a@spidernet.com.cy (Ivo Pezer, 5B4ADA/9A3A)
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 16:32:36 +0200
- My message was more about ACTIVITY and FUN, I was not saying the smaller the better... on the My antenna is small - it's full size Inverted V, but only 16 meters above the ground. I may have advantag
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00101.html (10,423 bytes)
- 5. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 1)
- Author: herbs@islands.vi (Herb Schoenbohm)
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 14:40:10 -0400
- <38A57BE6.6DC95A8D@islands.vi> Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Bill, Thanks for the advice
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00103.html (8,519 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu