Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+placement\s+oc\s+coil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+placement\s+oc\s+coil\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: placement oc coil (score: 1): Author: w5jmw@towerfarm.net; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:09:56 -0600; Hello to all.I am planning a 60 foot vertical.I am wanting to either place a coil on the vertical for topband.The vertical is a hy-tower.I have base loaded(not very effective) I have toploaded with a; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00153.html (6,555 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: placement oc coil (score: 1): Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:19:31 +0000; Hello John I, too, have experimented with base and top loading with verticals on Topband. No question about it, the toploading is much better. Just take a look at your feedpoint impedance with the ba; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00154.html (9,224 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: placement oc coil (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:24:36 -0400; Rule of thumb...The higher you place the loading coil on the tower before the horizontal top loading wire, the more efficient the antenna will be. If the coil is at the top and then connects to a top; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00155.html (9,073 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: placement oc coil (score: 1): Author: Buzz Jehle <buzz@logi.us>; Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:31:07 +0000; _________________ A. E. BUZZ JEHLE POB 2277 BANDERA TX 78003-2277 USA 1 830 796 4196 CELL 1 713 725 5914 Rule of thumb...The higher you place the loading coil on the tower before the horizontal top l; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00156.html (9,309 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]