Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+parallel\s+wire\s+verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+parallel\s+wire\s+verticals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: wb1dog@yahoo.com (Jim Apple); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT); I've been considering building a BC Trapper (the wire version of the Battle Creek Special) But I got to wondering if I could skip the traps and run three wires in parallel with a single feed instead; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00122.html (7,144 bytes)
2. Topband: parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:11:33 +0800; VK6VZ replied: G'day I run parallel inverted vee dipoles for 160 and 40m, which work FB. These are spaced 6 inches apart, using spacers made from plastic reticulation tubing and held in place at each; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00126.html (7,779 bytes)
3. Topband: parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: n9dx@attbi.com (Larry Higgins); Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:12:47 -0500; I tried this 30 years ago on 20 and 15. Maybe it would work the same way for 160/80. At the time, I was in northern Thailand where available materials were very limited. My house had a sheet metal ro; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00139.html (8,021 bytes)
4. Topband: parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: stans@rockisland.com (stan seiffert); Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:33:29 -0700; Hi, Just remember that if you feed the three antennas in parallel you will = also have a good radiator for whatever harmonic output you may have on = 80 and 40 when you transmit on 160. Stan W7AWA --; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00141.html (6,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]