Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+mfj\s+1025\s+vs\s+1026\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+mfj\s+1025\s+vs\s+1026\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: mfj 1025 vs 1026 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Sala" <k7awb@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:10:34 -0800; I appreciate the discussion of noise canceling devices. After reviewing the MFJ devices on their web site, I cannot understand the differences between the 1025 and 1026. They seem too similar. The 10; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00167.html (6,930 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: mfj 1025 vs 1026 (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:55:16 -0800; After reviewing the MFJ devices on their web site, I cannot understand the differences between the 1025 and 1026. I think the difference is that the 1026 has a whip that serves as a sense antenna; wh; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00172.html (7,374 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: mfj 1025 vs 1026 (score: 1): Author: "Harold Smith" <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:45:59 -0600; Steve: The MFJ 1026 comes with a small telescoping antenna that can be used as the "noise" antenna. It also contains a preamplifier for the "noise" antenna. The 1025 does not have this. In most case; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00175.html (7,894 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]