Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lower\s+ionosphere\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lower\s+ionosphere\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: lower ionosphere? (score: 1): Author: Carl K9LA <k9la@gte.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:50:26 -0500; That is a myth in the making due to poorly written press releases. If you dig into the details, you'll find that the satellite was only measuring the equatorial ionosphere (the orbit inclination is 1; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00088.html (6,983 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: lower ionosphere? (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optimum.net; Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:38:30 +0000 (GMT); So, you are trying to imply that atmosphere/ionosphere is only lowered around equator? What magic keeps it unaffected at higher latitudes? Earth is a sphere, atmosphere/ionosphere is envelope around; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00091.html (8,401 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: lower ionosphere? (score: 1): Author: Carl K9LA <k9la@gte.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:04:59 -0500; Yuri, Since that satellite only measured the equatorial ionosphere, the conclusions are only valid for the equatorial ionosphere. There's no magic involved. It's simply an understanding of the differ; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00092.html (8,111 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: lower ionosphere? (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:40:57 -0500; No. Unless, as in Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law of Prediction, you happen to consider any sufficiently advanced technology indistinguishable from magic. Karl's caveat is just be cognizant of the data; /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00101.html (8,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]