Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lightning\s+grounds\s+for\s+elevated\s+radial\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+lightning\s+grounds\s+for\s+elevated\s+radial\s+antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: lightning grounds for elevated radial antennas (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:23:04 -0800; A lengthy thread re grounding on towertalk prompts me to have concerns about protection of my T top (85' to top plus two 33' top wires) wire 160m vertical with eight 125' elevated radials. Since that; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00222.html (7,322 bytes)
2. Topband: lightning grounds for elevated radial antennas (score: 1): Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:25:54 -0700; Hi, Grant Seems like everyone is preoccupied with K5P and the deterioration of 160m DXCC standards, etc. Hi! Here's what I have picked up over the years. My comments address lightning mitigation only; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00378.html (10,821 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: lightning grounds for elevated radial antennas (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:58:15 -0600; I have some photos of the lightning protection scheme on mine at www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html which uses a 3-electrode spark gap. Scroll down to "The W0BTU 160 Meter Inverted-L Antenna". Maybe it'll; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00381.html (7,365 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]