- 1. Topband: freq's to avoid (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Nichols" <kd9sv@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:37:50 -0400
- Some time ago a list was put together listing frequencies to avoid which were bad for receiving in Europe and Far East. Would someone have that list handy they could share with the three old phardts
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00136.html (6,659 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: freq's to avoid (score: 1)
- Author: "W7TMT" <w7tmt@dayshaw.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:39:03 -0800
- Some time ago a list was put together listing frequencies to avoid which were bad for receiving in Europe and Far East. Would someone have that list handy they could share with the three old phardts
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00137.html (7,842 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: freq's to avoid (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@k8nd.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:06:25 -0500
- __ Thanks for the nice words, Patrick! I have updated that Op Aid a few times since the 2005 edition, and the most recent can be found at: http://www.k8nd.com/Radio/Planning/CQWW160/TopbandBadFreqs.
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00138.html (9,235 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: freq's to avoid (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:39:41 -0500
- Good work on the list Jeff and Dennis. I was just looking for something like that myself to post for operators here. One thing puzzles me. Why are some frequencies not multiples of 9 kHz (like say 18
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00141.html (8,008 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu