Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+folded\s+umbrella\s+for\s+160\s+meter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+folded\s+umbrella\s+for\s+160\s+meter\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: folded umbrella for 160 meter (score: 1): Author: wo4r_jeff--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:45:16 +0000 (UTC); In searching the archives I see a little discussion of the folded umbrella antenna. This looks interesting. Just thought I would see what the folks on this list think about it Jeff WO4R ___________; /archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00077.html (6,928 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: folded umbrella for 160 meter (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:10:09 -0400; Problem with the "folded umbrella" on 160 is that when the angle of declivity is to acute serious cancellation takes place. Also the feed of such an antenna is sometimes is very complex. I think this; /archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00078.html (8,022 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]