Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+elevated\s+vs\s+buried\s+radials\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:33:29 -0500
March/April 2005 National Contest Journal has the last part of a two-part article by K3LC. He used Eznec Pro 4.0 with a double precision NEC-4 calculating engine. Much much data, but here's a simplif
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00040.html (7,402 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:37:34 -0500
to the US gov't survey (mentioned in previous postings to this list)? I envy the "30" and even the "16" areas, being in a "4". "Very Good": conductivity = 30 mS/m, dielectric constant = 20. "Average"
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00042.html (8,258 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:25:07 -0600
...etc. de W4ZV ____________ The K3LC article has valuable comparison data, but we need to consider a significant variable in his modeling process. I have found Al's work very interesting and useful
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00046.html (8,792 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:23:55 -1000
Hi Gary, This is so typical of vertical/radial system performance comparison data. Of course more data is better, and I am glad this data has been published (even though I can't see it) I sure would
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00055.html (8,036 bytes)

5. Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:15:06 -0500
Maybe I should get off my duff and get into modeling myself, but until I do..... I'd like to know if anyone has included the gull wing effect of using elevated radials with a ground mounted vertical
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00057.html (8,011 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: elevated vs buried radials (score: 1)
Author: Michael Sapp <Michael_Sapp_WA3TTS@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:12:09 -0500
Hello Bill (W4ZV) and Group: Bill wrote: > For some reason K3LC did not model the 2 elevated radial case but it would have been interesting to have seen that. That would be interesting for me as well
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00061.html (8,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu