Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+dx\s+windows\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+dx\s+windows\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: larrytx@co.intel.com (LarryX Tyree contractor for brentc); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 97 15:10:37 PST; It would be great if we could keep it clear up to 1840. There are some good openings to Africa happening these days, and they like to show up around 1836 and then ask for QSOs up two. It would be ni; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00289.html (7,847 bytes)
2. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 18:13:39 -0800; I agree with tree....wat i still don't understand was the lack dx window observance during the recent stew perry 160 test?? was it because the sponsors forgot to specifically request it? -- -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00291.html (8,486 bytes)
3. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark); Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 08:50:41 -0600; re topband windows: We flogged this to death earlier this year. Can't we please give it a rest! Craig Craig Clark Hu-rah! now W1JCC ex NX1G, N1ACH, WA1QWW, WN1IGG send me e-mail and I'll put you on o; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00296.html (7,642 bytes)
4. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 01:05:57 -0500 (EST); How about a smaller DX only Window, maybe 5kHz or ten Khz, with USA operation kept outside the DX area. Who the heck established the half-@$$*& "plan" we have? As long as we keep the "system" that wa; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00308.html (7,523 bytes)
5. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: tree@lady.axian.com (Larry Tyree); Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 23:00:24 -0800 (PST); Tonight, ZS4TX was 579 here on 1836. I hope that we can keep enough room open for him to work us during the contest. 1830-1840 - DX QSOs only - per the band plan. Tree N6TR tree@contesting.com -- FA; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00309.html (7,723 bytes)
6. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (AA1K Jon Zaimes); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 08:26:34 -0500 (EST); Still too big Tom. How about one kHz; I'd suggest 1999 kHz. Propagation should be better there, too. The DX can take turns. All times scheduled in advance. 73/Jon AA1K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00313.html (7,284 bytes)
7. TopBand: DX windows (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 10:35:26 -0500 (EST); When I worked him, he was S9. Because of confusion with the "band plan" three guys were on top of him when he sent my report. Even with an S 9 signal, I had to wait until everyone quit QRMing him and; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00315.html (8,583 bytes)
8. TopBand: DX WINDOWS (score: 1): Author: AE7H@webtv.net (DON TAYLOR); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 12:22:47 -0700; WHINE - WHINE - WHINE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00320.html (7,030 bytes)
9. Topband: DX windows (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:23:32 -0600; It has been interesting reading the dicussion about the DX Windows. I think I am glad that the Stew Perry contest doesn't take a position on them. Personally, I have mixed emotions about them. And as; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00338.html (10,487 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: dx windows (score: 1): Author: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:05:17 +0800; Hi Craig You are right to a point, mate. The main thing is for the DX window to be free of European and North Americans CQing, so there is room for the DX to operate there. At the moment, stations as; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00165.html (7,885 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: dx windows (score: 1): Author: Ronald Sekkel <py2fus@integral.com.br>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:53:39 -0200; I was just thinking about it ! Steve, the problem is if the US or EU station transmits within the DX window, he is QRMing around his area, "closing" the window for others to QSO. In the old days of t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00171.html (8,581 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: dx windows (score: 1): Author: "Ian Keyser" <ian.keyser@btopenworld.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:12:01 -0000; Have multiple small windows been thought about? 2 or 3 KHz wide for each continent? Ian, G3ROO _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00172.html (7,398 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: dx windows (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:40:57 -0600; As much as we would all hope otherwise, I'm fearful that the notion of DX windows would soon dominate any contest on Topband. Let's face it, last week we had about 1500 people using 60 KHz of spectru; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00179.html (8,352 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: dx windows (score: 1): Author: herbs@surfvi.com; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:56:27 -0400; Quoting Ford Peterson <ford@cmgate.com>: Great! Is this not a excellent demo of good spectrum utilization even under weak signal conditions? Brilliant!!!! especially if the opening is at local sunris; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00183.html (7,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]