Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+cluster\-QSOs\s+Y\s+or\s+N\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+cluster\-QSOs\s+Y\s+or\s+N\s+\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: df2py@t-online.de; Date: 11 Nov 2005 15:47 GMT; hi reflectees ! according to cluster observations, the number of so-called cluster QSOs is increasing. I just copied the folowing from todays spots: WA7TZY-@ 1832.3 SM5EDX ur 439 in WA, calling u 053; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00098.html (6,455 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: MorgusMagnificen@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:08:09 EST; Wolf: Thanks for bringing it my attention. I would not have noticed normally because I consider DX clusters another pseudo-drug in the modern world and never visit them. I turn on my radio and if the; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00099.html (7,062 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:29:15 +0000; DF2PY posted: I think maybe Wolf is making a comment by simply posting it. ;^) What do others think? 160m is a tough band at times. Seems that non-radio-means assistance is all the rage nowadays - wi; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00100.html (8,077 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:33:38 -0500; Seems with spotting when just It not just the newbies who spot themselves Brett. 160 also has always been faced with the problem of what really are non-QSO's being counted as QSO's. This has ALWAYS; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00102.html (8,719 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: "Ian Keyser" <ian.keyser@btopenworld.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:18:13 -0000; I agree with Tom..... I, and a lot of my friends, could not give an iota that joe blogs has DXCC ten times on 160m..... it is of little interest to anyone but the person who as done it.... if it's be; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00105.html (7,816 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: cluster-QSOs Y or N ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:10:11 -0600; It depends entirely on how the operators involved handle the information. I can hear almost none of the 160m cluster spots, thanks to lots of receive noise. In fact, I read the cluster mostly so that; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00111.html (8,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]