Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+cheating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+cheating\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: John Randall via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:31:38 +0000 (UTC); Although I have never chased awards, I too am shocked at how easy it has become for those so inclined to cheat the system, but not only the system ,but themselves as well. Ofcourse not everyone will; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00180.html (7,630 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: Steve Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:32:13 -0600; John, is the use of a remote receiver not allowed for DXCC? I dont believe it is prohibited. I ask because your use of the word cheating suggests that it is. Is that what you are saying? Steve Daniel; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00182.html (8,477 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:47:45 -0600; Read: http://www.arrl.org/dxcc-rules Section I. Basic Rules, #9 ... 9. Station Location and Boundary: a) All stations used to make contacts for a specific DXCC award must be located within the same D; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00183.html (8,582 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:16:15 -0800 (PST); Hi, Thanks for stating the rules. I believe the (a) basically means if you move from one state to another within your country your DXCC is still valid and you don't have to start over. I would not wa; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00185.html (15,266 bytes)
5. Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:32:01 -0500; I may be missing something here. The way I interpret the excerpt below is that it's ok to use remote stations, within the same DXCC entity or outside of it. 'Station' here meaning TX and RX together,; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00189.html (8,416 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:54:33 +0100; And if all stations would be be obliged to feed their transmit and receive audio online and in realtime to a homepage you don´t have that RFI problems either... 73, Peter Read: http://www.arrl.org/dx; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00191.html (9,372 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:28:04 -0500; With apologies to Tree, who has asked that this subject be dropped... The question of the effect of a remote receiver or receivers has already been dealt with by some contest organizers needing clari; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00195.html (11,262 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: JL PFIRMAN <w3to76@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:13:52 -0500 (EST); well said Guy,you hit a home run with the bases loaded! thank you 73 Jim W3TO _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00196.html (12,685 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: STEVE DANIEL <nn4t@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:23:38 -0600 (CST); Guy. You did it the "hard" way did you? I have been a ham and DXer since 1973 and have always encountered people like you. "You don't know how hard it was when I was your age. You have no idea how ha; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00197.html (13,483 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1): Author: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:29:17 -0600; Well that was a lot of help Steve.... You can crawl back under your rock now... Cecil K5DL Sent using recycled electrons. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_top; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00198.html (13,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]