Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+big\s+K9AY\-loop\s+\+\s+MFJ\s+10126\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+big\s+K9AY\-loop\s+\+\s+MFJ\s+10126\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: big K9AY-loop + MFJ 10126 (score: 1): Author: "Johan de Vos" <johan.devos@planet.nl>; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:30:23 +0100; Hi all, In have set up a loop which is twice as big as the normal K9AY loop; a little more noise, but signals are much louder. I was able to work V8 and could hear AH2L easily. Question is, what will; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00158.html (7,131 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: big K9AY-loop + MFJ 10126 (score: 1): Author: "Ryszard Tymkiewicz" <rtym@ippt.gov.pl>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:45:42 +0100; Another experiment is 2 verticals spaced ¼ wave (40m apart) tuned for 160m. The verticals are 6 mtrs long and in use with the MFJ 1026. It works, but not as good as the K9AY loops. So next exp; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00162.html (8,010 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: big K9AY-loop + MFJ 10126 (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:44:11 -0600; The best size for a K9AY (or EWE, pendant, flag, etc) is a compromise between gain and lobe shape. As you go down in frequency the shape of the lobes of these antennas gets better but the gain drops; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00163.html (11,308 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: big K9AY-loop + MFJ 10126 (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:39:12 -0600; de PA5A: K9AY quote per Dennis W0JX/8: "The loop's published size (25 feet high, +/-15 feet to the corners) is about 2/3 the maximum size for 160M. At one point, I was using one 30 feet high and +/-2; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00177.html (9,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]