Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+beverage\s+above\s+water\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+beverage\s+above\s+water\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: df2py@t-online.de (DF2PY); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:09:03 +0100; hello reflectees ! For the last 3 weeks i am using my beverages above water.About 2/3 of the length of my WNW,NW and NNW beverages is above water after the river flooded the terrain. I have been swit; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00161.html (7,996 bytes)
2. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: n9dx@attbi.com (Larry Higgins); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 17:04:03 -0500; bad > beverage performance over good grounds isn`t worth a dime. Say what ?? Actually, ground conductivity is probably NOT very good. The conductivity of sea water is MUCH lower than that of copper,; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00162.html (7,684 bytes)
3. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: wb6tza@socal.rr.com (wb6tza@socal.rr.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:10:39 +0000; Actually, the conductivity is less important than the velocity factor. A copper wire beverage above a (big) copper sheet wont behave at all like a beverage because the signals travel thru both sides; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00164.html (8,527 bytes)
4. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: ve3zi@rac.ca (Roger Parsons); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 04:19:04 +0000 (GMT); In my experience it makes very little difference what is under (or around) the beverage. I have 12 beverages at 30 degree intervals here. The due south/due north beverages are the same antenna fed at; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00165.html (7,961 bytes)
5. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:27:21 -0800; I can verify that Beverage work better when they are over soil with poorer conductivity. Here at my Mojave Desert home where the soil has poor conductivity, Beverages are an outstanding receive anten; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00170.html (7,223 bytes)
6. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: nhp@ieee.org (Nick Hall-Patch); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:44:58 -0800; I've used medium wave Beverages (partially) over Pacific Ocean salt water, and heard plenty of DX. There was no scientific comparison made by putting up a nearby Beverage over poor ground, as this wa; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00172.html (9,416 bytes)
7. Topband: beverage above water (score: 1): Author: k4kyv@hotmail.com (Donald Chester); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:50:49; There has been a lot of discussion and little agreement on this specific topic by numerous "experts". W1WCR advocates a ground wire under the HF Beverage, based exactly on what you said. Others say; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00175.html (10,122 bytes)
8. Topband: Beverage above water (score: 1): Author: df2py@t-online.de (Dr .Wolf Ostwald); Date: 16 Jan 2004 12:17 GMT; hello reflectees ! Here is another observation that will undoubtly add to the confusion about bev-performance. The last days the Rhine river rose by about 10 ft.Submerging two of my 4 radiator`s feed; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00143.html (7,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]