Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Zero\s+Beat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Zero\s+Beat\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Jim Bennett <w6jhb@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:30:56 -0800; Just my two cents worth on the zero beat issue. My station is one of the little guns / squirt guns. I operated in the weekend's contest with a K3/100 into an Inverted L with only 25 feet in the verti; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00060.html (7,572 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:44:46 -0800; I'm not a little gun, but you are absolutely correct. The thing to do is answer about 50 Hz above or below zero beat. I have been doing this for years. Just enough to allow the running station to dis; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00063.html (7,457 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:58:07 -0500; Hi, I just got home from my first Santa gig of the season. After I sent my last post I got to wondering how many hams have their main focus in areas other than the technical aspects of amateur radio; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00064.html (8,181 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:42:42 -0500; Bill The root cause (which you are addressing in this instance) is a lack of elmer-ing/mentor-ing. Our hobby is blessed with many who know a lot, and are willing to share without making the less-know; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00070.html (7,937 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Missouri Guy <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 02:46:39 +0000; Heh..heh...at least he got on and made some people happy to the QSO in their log. :D) 73, Charlie, N0TT _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00072.html (7,155 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:03:25 -0500; Charlie & Mark, Im glad This is brought up.. One thing I use when chasing weak sig dx is a audio pan adapter so to speak ( DM780 ) I see the tone QRG of the RX sig and my Side tone .. which is adjust; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00073.html (8,831 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: "VE6WZ_Steve" <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:12:38 -0700; I think this zero beat issue is being a bit "over-done" in my opinion.....It is not a requirement to be zero beat is it? Reasons for non-zero beat: 1.) some (as others have mentioned) will purposely; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00074.html (8,189 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:12:50 -0700; Jim and Rick - SPOT ON with being off just slightly....that can make the difference (well, in these contests that doesn't help, necessarily, for my QRP peanut whistle)! I think this whole zero beat d; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00079.html (10,067 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:28:57 -0500; Thank you Mark, I have setup a folder in my mail client to hold all of the messages for this project. Most of the correspondence will be off-list. I am going to ask for help from members of a couple; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00081.html (9,471 bytes)
10. Topband: Zero Beat (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:01:03 -0500; Hi All, Well, for the life of me, I don't understand why anyone would get their shorts in a such knots over the issue of zero beating... The big advantage of CW over other modes that's been touted fo; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00085.html (8,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]