Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Yaesu\s+Key\s+clicks\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: SteamBoilers@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:17:14 EST
W8JI Toms FT1000 key click mod works great. Well done Tom, Yaesu still showing no interest in solving the problem. What's needed is a switch to bypass the mod for contests with maybe a points increas
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00238.html (6,346 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:06:01 -0800
Somebody should have asked that Yaesu rep why they sell CW filters if nobody uses them and how big contest stations can work 7000 qsos on CW if nobody is using that mode anymore. Sounds like that guy
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00239.html (7,974 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 04:49:52 -0000
I guess the Yaesu rep never owned an hf transceiver? A really good example of cw being dead would be letting him listen to 160 during the ARRL 160 contest or of course this weekend. Even though my si
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00241.html (7,855 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:46:33 -0600
example I tried working 160 this weekend to scare up some multipliers for CQWW, and found it next to dead. I was able to make a grand total of 4 QSO's with a KW. Yes, I heard a few guys trying to wor
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00245.html (8,181 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:49:26 -0500
multipliers for CQWW, total of 4 QSO's with a stations, but I didn't hear were a couple of On the other hand with only about one hour of total operating time I worked all continents including deep i
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00253.html (8,465 bytes)

6. RE: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:39:53 +0100
I tried working 160 this weekend to scare up some multipliers for CQWW, and found it next to dead. I was able to make a grand total of 4 QSO's with a KW. Yes, I heard a few guys trying to work a few
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00254.html (8,113 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:23:50 -0600
Some folks with megastations like yours tend to lose sight of how the majority of hams have to live. A month ago, I sat at my mountaintop station in CA and had a bunch of 160 Q's on a Saturday night
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00256.html (9,538 bytes)

8. RE: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "John Langridge KB5NJD" <kb5njd@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:13:55 -0600
Jim: Where do you operate on 160 CW? I hear loads of guys below 1820 calling CQ and working other stations almost every night from my penny-whistle station here in North Texas. In fact, several time
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00268.html (8,374 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:17:37 -0500
of how Hi Jim, Your observation was that no one was on CW, and that's why a manufacturer in a country where 160 is 100% CW by law doesn't need to worry about correcting a design problem that won't e
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00272.html (9,099 bytes)

10. RE: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Spencer" <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:26:37 -0500
Regardless of whether there are more or less ops on cw I think the real point is that a major radio manufacturer (in this case Yaesu) has continued to build radios that have well known and easily fix
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00275.html (10,488 bytes)

11. RE: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:48:48 -0800
Lets not just pick on Yaesu here.... Remember that the 756 PROII has keyclicks too when set at the default settings! The keyclicks are much better at the highest setting, but not as good as could be.
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00277.html (12,003 bytes)

12. RE: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:58:14 -0500
However, for a new radio, the Yaesu's beat the other Japanese radios for receiver performance. I would rather have a modified MarkV( with roofing filter) than a ProII. of course for twice the price y
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00278.html (11,558 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:55:26 -0800
"Remember that the 756 PROII has keyclicks too when set at the default settings! The keyclicks are much better at the highest setting, but not as good as could be." == Jim is exactly right! 756 PROII
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00283.html (8,352 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:55:44 -0800
"...And for 6 times the price you could have an IC7800 or FTDX9000 that doesnt beat an Orion." == I wasn't aware that the FTdx9000 has had any lab test results published yet. Where is that info avail
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00284.html (8,041 bytes)

15. Topband: Yaesu Key clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:48:45 -0500
K6SE suggested "756 PROII users, please crank your CW "Rise Time" up to "8 msec". And this is also true for the Ten-Tec Orion! The menu setting for cw risetime needs to be at 8msec or 10msec to avoid
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00286.html (7,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu