Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+XR0X\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+XR0X\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:07:17 -0600; For the past few mornings, I have been trying in vain to hear XR0X well enough on 160 meters to work them. This morning at around 1100Z, I could copy some of the calls & the reports of the ststions t; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00184.html (8,428 bytes)
2. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:26:46 +0000; Hi Brad, If you haven't done so already, you might try one of the MFJ or Timewave noise cancellors as a stop gap until you get the problem fixed with the power company. If you have a single noise sou; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00188.html (7,616 bytes)
3. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:37:45 -0500; In my limited experience, these work great if it really is a discrete source, like the infamous thermostatically-controlled dog dish. They tend not to be much help if the noisemaker is up on a pole c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00189.html (7,753 bytes)
4. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: john.devoldere@pandora.be (John Devoldere); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:00:32 -0000; This morning I was in the shack at 04:00 UTC and set the RX to 1826.5, = while doing some other work on the computer. At 05:40 I heard someone = briefly tuning, and then "XR0X QRZ" at about an honest; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00190.html (8,152 bytes)
5. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:57:31 +0000; I dunno if I buy those arguments. I would tend to think that even if the powerlines are reradiating energy from a single discharge point, the vector sum at your receiver should still looks like a sin; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00193.html (7,935 bytes)
6. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: john.w1fv@telocity.com (John Kaufmann); Date: 20 Mar 2002 15:30:27 -0800; Yes, this is basically correct. The key point is that in order to null the noise, there must be a stable RF phase relationship between the noise waveforms received in the main receive antenna feedlin; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00195.html (8,186 bytes)
7. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:14:51 +0000; Tnx to John posting I managed to get up this morning. I worked PJ2/DL7DF when his sigs came up around daybreak. XR0X was heard around 0455 with a good s 5 signal and disappeared 0517 UTC. No QSO but; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00196.html (7,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]