Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+copying\s+the\s+weakest\s+DX\s+\-\s+DSP\s+or\s+theear\-brain\s+combo\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+is\s+best\s+for\s+copying\s+the\s+weakest\s+DX\s+\-\s+DSP\s+or\s+theear\-brain\s+combo\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or theear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 19:04:24 +0000; It is interesting to note that Tom and others share exactly the same experience as I have. There is a certain 'flavour' to DSP audio that is not making it easier to copy weak signals in the noise. I; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00027.html (13,543 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or theear-brain combo? (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 19:13:35 +0000; Correction to my previous posting (see below). Not a "few tenths of a Hz wide", instead it should say "a few Hz wide, say 20-50Hz".. 73 Peter SM2CEW _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - htt; /archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00028.html (9,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]