Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Which\s+compromise\s+receiving\s+antenna\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:40:07 -0500
I've just spent a very educational hour with Google Earth looking at my Beverage options for 160M.  On a 45/225 azimuth I can only get about 215 feet.  Is that even worth doing with a conventional Be
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00019.html (7,204 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:06:03 -0800
A DHDL will fit in a lot less length and work better IMO than either Beverage choice.  You can put relays in small boxes at the feed transformer and termination to flip the directivity with two feedl
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00020.html (8,823 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: Joel Gray <joelgray77@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:06:04 -0600
For the last two seasons, I had two 225' BOGs put out; one pointing NE, and one pointing SE. They worked well. I also have a K9AY, and in general, I like the K9AY performance better than the BOGs. An
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00021.html (9,296 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: <n4is@n4is.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:12:44 -0500
Hi Pete I don't understand why Beverage at first place, A rotatable Vertical WF can perform 11.5 db RDF on 160-80-60 and 40m rotatable on any direction and it take only 50ft maximum. If you want high
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00022.html (9,224 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd - N9LB" <lloydberg@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:02:46 -0600
I have 3x KD9SV Reversible-BOGs ranging from 175 feet to 300 feet long, they all receive much better than using my TX vertical. Make sure that you have good grounding at each end! I also have a parti
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00023.html (8,527 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:46:39 -0500 (EST)
Hi Pete, The bad news is that 215 feet is not long enough to produce good performance from a Beverage. It will work for a BOG, but that's not your best choice. Could you install two or three short ve
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00024.html (8,824 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:16:47 -0800
Could you install two or three short verticals over a total length of 120 feet? The YCCC three element array is a superb choice if you can. The Hi-Z arrays are also worthy of consideration. https://
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00025.html (8,628 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "John Kaufmann" <john.kaufmann@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:40:41 -0500
I designed the YCCC preamp so I can answer the question about the AD8055 op amp. As used in the YCCC preamp, the linearity is actually very good. We use a YCCC receiving array at KC1XX in a multi-ope
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00029.html (11,146 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:41:26 -0800
Thanks so much for explaining the amplifier choice. The choice of a thru-hole part is completely understandable in light of the positioning of this system as a kit. The choice to use unity voltage ga
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00035.html (12,215 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: Peter <pc2a@pi4cc.nl>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:03:42 +0100
Hi Here at PI4CC we are busy with building a 9 circle array. And our motto is DIY so we have create a PCB for the RX preamp around the AD8055 ala the YCCC Some details are at https://www.pi4cc.nl/tec
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00036.html (11,986 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: <gregg.w6izt1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:48:59 -0500
Pete: I'm using RG6 for my beverages. They are switched, bidirectional. Performance seems to be equivalent to a single wire beverage. They can also be deployed as a BOG. RG6 is cheap, and I built my
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00257.html (10,665 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:27:22 -0800
I'm using RG6 for my beverages. They are switched, bidirectional. Performance seems to be equivalent to a single wire beverage. They can also be deployed as a BOG. RG6 is cheap, and I built my own tr
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00259.html (9,893 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Which compromise receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:39:49 -0500
I have the jk version, was using it as a ewe, which worked ok, recently converted it to a bog, about 200 ft long, easy to build, seems to work , worked a bunch this weekend which I could not hear on
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00262.html (12,348 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu