Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:15:54 -0400
Many years ago when topbanders were looking for better efficiency and something thart would radiate with limited space lots there was the "Z" which was essentially a way of feeding a 1/2 wave sloper
On 2/15/2015 3:15 PM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: Many years ago when topbanders were looking for better efficiency and something thart would radiate with limited space lots there was the "Z" which was
Rick, I think it had more to do with getting something out of the shack window with the tuner inside. I also think it had more to getting the current maximum at the top of the pole. The OT's used to
Rick, I think it had more to do with getting something out of the shack window with the tuner inside. I also think it had more to getting the current maximum at the top of the pole. The OT's used to
Tom, Thanks for the details on the "Z" for TB. On a related matter I have been looking for comparisons between a "L" and a "T" firmly believing that a "T" would be better as in 65' up and 135' horizo
Tom, Thanks for the details on the "Z" for TB. On a related matter I have been looking for comparisons between a "L" and a "T" firmly believing that a "T" would be better as in 65' up and 135' horizo
A good analysis of all this can be found from IV3PRK as he planned his antenna for his new QTH in HC land. http://www.iv3prk.it/user/image/site2-inverted-l-vs-vertical-t.pdf 73...Stan, K5GO Sent from
I seem to remember that ant and another person who claimed to get a goo match with a sloper fed with a i think 1/4w of wire conected at abt 2` from base of tower .I have lost them notes . I put up a