Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+What\s+IS\s+troubling\s+about\s+this\s+report\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:39:57 -0600
....from one of the K1N ops is there is nothing new here.....all of his dozen plus points is/ae SOOOOO fundamental to anyone chasing DX.......terrible operating habits or approaches by the majority o
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00058.html (15,463 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: "Tom WA2BCK" <WA2BCK@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:04:41 -0400
Glenn, Your summary was wonderful and loaded with excellent advice. I often wonder why stations persist in calling on the DX stations transmit frequency. Surely by now, the entire ham radio community
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00061.html (18,608 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:48:02 -0600
Much of the time it is a simple mistake. I did it to the E30 tonight and I am trying to be very careful. I changed bands and came back and the split was cancelled. I was that Lid. Usually a simple up
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00062.html (20,485 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 07:42:00 -0400
All what is said is true. Dx also should listen on his own TX frequency and when they hear a carrier QSY +-1 and let the DQRM-er QRM an unused frequency. Just a suggestion. 73 Lou KE1F Usually a simp
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00063.html (21,305 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:31:06 +0000
I saw one of the E30FB operators doing that by sliding up a few hundred Hz transmitting while the DQRM was on. Those listening could see it and follow. That particular DQRM seemed to give up shortly
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00064.html (7,799 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:10:40 -0400
Sometimes the DXpedition is its own worst enemy. If they ask for W6 and then relent after a couple tries to work the W6 and then works someone else sends the message is you guys can bulldoze me so ke
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00065.html (23,302 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Scribner" <dscribner@twc.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:26:22 -0400
Sometimes you don't want to follow the DX instructions... Yesterday E30FB was on 18.155, listening up 5 to 15, which ends up being out of band. That didn't stop lots calling above 18.168.... K1ZO Som
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00066.html (23,646 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:29:14 -0400
Hi All, Talk about a DX-Pedition being its own worse enemy... As a guy with no lap top in the shack--hence, no immediate access to on-line chat rooms, spotting sites, etc.--what I hate most are those
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00067.html (10,035 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: G3OIT <g3oit.keith@jillings.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:58:34 +0000
As a guy with no lap top in the shack--hence, no immediate access to on-line chat rooms, spotting sites, etc.--what I hate most are those DX-Peditions that repeatedly work stations without ID'ing, or
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00068.html (8,931 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:28:53 -0400
You're right. I forget which one did it but I think was E30 calling up 5 to 15 and 9Q was at 15 up. Still in band but causing QRM. The 9Q and 7Q have kept their pileups fairly close to their own freq
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00069.html (24,455 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu