Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Wellbrook\s+Loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Wellbrook\s+Loop\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1): Author: Michael Rutkaus <mrutkaus@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:45:37 -0400; I've had a Wellbrook 1530 for a few years, it is quiet and useful on 160. Mike K4QET _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00189.html (6,237 bytes)
2. Topband: Wellbrook loop (score: 1): Author: Michael Rutkaus <mrutkaus@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:01:33 -0400; I've been using the Wellbrook Loop for ten years or so, It hasn't given me any problems. It has less noise than my 160 OCFD. However at the moment listening to the net on1875, it also has a lower sig; /archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00003.html (7,071 bytes)
3. Topband: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1): Author: <richard@rodsley.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:51:55 -0500; I have used a Wellbrook loop for the last couple of years with excellent results. It is mounted on a rotator on a short 8ft pole just outside the shack window. My other antennas are an invL currently; /archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00005.html (6,766 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1): Author: List Mail <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au>; Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:04:25 +1100; I can vouch for Richards very good ears, having had a couple of QSO with him last month in VERY marginal condition. Ill be looking for EU DX again soon, after the CME shock subsides. 73, Luke VK3HJ S; /archives//html/Topband/2021-11/msg00006.html (7,714 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]