Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+WAS\s+on\s+160\s+meters\s+in\s+three\s+\(3\)\s+days\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:12:25 +0000
hello all, and thanks for all the kind replies. My half-blind left eye caused me to overlook the fact that I worked Alex, W0ZTL for a second Top Band QSO on the morning of December 10. This means tha
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00164.html (7,500 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Congratulations! To you and F8BPN, a good contrast in the time required by DX to obtain WAS. If I recall correctly, Gene, KB7Q worked WAS the first night of ARRL160 this year from Montana... An envia
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00170.html (9,311 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:04:08 +0000 (GMT)
We are also keeping listings of WAS and DXCC worked during the single contest and time length. http://www.k3bu.us/was_dxcc_contest.htm Please check it out and if any additions or updates, please let
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00171.html (11,206 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:41:49 -0400
WAS on 160 is much easier today even for DX. I had done it before in 29 hours but during this years ARRL 160 Contest I dropped that to under 9 hours. Idaho rather than KH6 or KL7 was the most elusive
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00172.html (7,965 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:49:42 -0700
Wonder how many worked WAS during this year's ARRL160, and it would have been a completely different game had it occurred this past weekend. -- Julius, My experience this year from DM52, extreme Sout
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00174.html (8,529 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: alan eshleman <oakame@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Not a record, but K6SRZ made 160 WAS in 15:23 (KD0S South Dakota was my 50th state).  I also had 160 WAS during last year's contest, but only 48 states show up on LOTW (DE and VT how about trying LOT
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00177.html (11,944 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: paulkb8n@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:18:56 EST
The guy who has the record this year, I believe, is Jim, W5JAW, in five hours! Incredibly, Jim did this with Low Power to a 12 FOOT VERTICAL !!! Can anyone top that?! Paul, K5AF In a message dated 12
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00178.html (8,797 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:16 -0800
Heya Milt, WAS in ARRL 160 op time 08:41 . Last two AH6V 0527Z, and AL9A 0641Z Darned good first night.. 73 Bob, W7RH -- Bob Kile, W7RH DM35OS -- Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, No Gate
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00185.html (8,031 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:24:54 -0600
that's pretty amazing 'low power' usually means 150w doesn't it? and if my 13 foot tall 160m antenna is comparable, that would mean about 1.5% or so efficiency, so, I'm guessing 150 x 0.015 = 2.25w E
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00186.html (8,100 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:20:01 -0400
Just ran the filter on the ARRL 160 Meter contest looking for WAS time and I was able to narrow it down to all 50 states worked here in 6 Hours and 45 minutes. In the past it was a struggle to make a
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00189.html (12,718 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu